Session 1

Kick-Off

Important

Please make sure that you answered the survey send to you by (StudOn) mail.

Prepare

✍️ Fill out the short survey before the 22.10.2025 (see StudOn for Link)

πŸ“– Read the syllabus

Participate

πŸ–₯️ Session 01

Literature

with focus on advertising
with focus on analysis
  • Araujo, T., Lock, I., & Van De Velde, B. (2020). Automated Visual Content Analysis (AVCA) in Communication Research: A Protocol for Large Scale Image Classification with Pre-Trained Computer Vision Models. Communication Methods and Measures, 14(4), 239–265. https://doi.org/10.1080/19312458.2020.1810648

  • Hoffmann, M., & Heft, A. (2020). β€œHere, There and Everywhere”: Classifying Location Information in Social Media Data - Possibilities and Limitations. Communication Methods and Measures, 14(3), 184–203. https://doi.org/10.1080/19312458.2019.1708282

  • Lokmanoglu, A. D., & Walter, D. (2025). Topic modeling of video and image data: a visual semantic unsupervised approach. Communication Methods and Measures, 19(3), 232–279. https://doi.org/10.1080/19312458.2025.2549707

  • Peng, Y., Lock, I., & Ali Salah, A. (2024). Automated Visual Analysis for the Study of Social Media Effects: Opportunities, Approaches, and Challenges. Communication Methods and Measures, 18(2), 163–185. https://doi.org/10.1080/19312458.2023.2277956

with focus on digital behavioral data
with focus on effects
  • Alonso Dos Santos, M., Lobos, C., MuΓ±oz, N., Romero, D., & Sanhueza, R. (2017). The Influence of Image Valence on the Attention Paid to Charity Advertising. Journal of Nonprofit & Public Sector Marketing, 29(3), 346–363. https://doi.org/10.1080/10495142.2017.1326355

  • Barry, A. M. (2002). Perception and Visual Communication Theory. Journal of Visual Literacy, 22(1), 91–106. https://doi.org/10.1080/23796529.2002.11674583

  • Bast, J., & Oschatz, C. (2025). Which Visuals Really Matter? Effects of (Counter) Stereotypical Visual Information on Candidate Evaluations. Communication Research, 00936502241309957. https://doi.org/10.1177/00936502241309957

  • Boomgaarden, H., Boukes, M., & Iorgoveanu, A. (2016). Image versus text: How newspaper reports affect evaluations of political candidates. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COMMUNICATION, 10, 2529–2555.

  • Casas, A., & Williams, N. W. (2019). Images that Matter: Online Protests and the Mobilizing Role of Pictures. Political Research Quarterly, 72(2), 360–375. https://doi.org/10.1177/1065912918786805

  • Geise, S., Panke, D., & Heck, A. (2021). Still ImagesMoving People? How Media Images of Protest Issues and Movements Influence Participatory Intentions. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 26(1), 92–118. https://doi.org/10.1177/1940161220968534

  • Krause, A., & Bucy, E. P. (2018). Interpreting Images of Fracking: How Visual Frames and Standing Attitudes Shape Perceptions of Environmental Risk and Economic Benefit. Environmental Communication, 12(3), 322–343. https://doi.org/10.1080/17524032.2017.1412996

  • Powell, T. E., Boomgaarden, H. G., De Swert, K., & De Vreese, C. H. (2015). A Clearer Picture: The Contribution of Visuals and Text to Framing Effects: Visual Framing Effects. Journal of Communication, 65(6), 997–1017. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12184

with focus on images
with focus on survey methods
  • Schnauber-Stockmann, A., & Karnowski, V. (2020). Mobile Devices as Tools for Media and Communication Research: A Scoping Review on Collecting Self-report Data in Repeated Measurement Designs. Communication Methods and Measures, 14(3), 145–164. https://doi.org/10/gks6zf

  • Masur, P. K. (2019). Capturing situational dynamics: Strength and pitfalls of the experience sampling method (P. MΓΌller, S. Geiß, T. K. Naab, & C. Peter, Eds.; Vol. 15). Herbert von Halem Verlag. https://osf.io/vx5ha

with focus on visual communication
with focus on visibility
  • Stehle, H., Bock, A., Wilhelm, C., Springer, N., Mahrt, M., Lobinger, K., Linke, C., Engelmann, I., Detel, H., & Brantner, C. (2024). In/visibility in the digital age: A literature review from a communication studies perspective. International Journal of Communication, 18, 23.
other interesting sources
  • Bodden, S., & Awcock, H. (2024). Stuck Up, Peeled Off, Covered Up, Shared and Scribbled Out: Doing Ordinary Politics with Political Stickers. GeoHumanities, 10(1), 131–149. https://doi.org/10.1080/2373566X.2024.2339848

  • McCosker, A., Kamstra, P., De Cotta, T., Farmer, J., Shaw, F., Teh, Z., & Soltani Panah, A. (2021). Social media for social good? A thematic, spatial and visual analysis of humanitarian action on Instagram. Information, Communication & Society, 24(13), 1870–1890. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2020.1748089

  • Michel, S., & Pappert, S. (2018). Wahlplakat-busting. Formen und funktionen einer (neuen) textmustermischung. Zeitschrift FΓΌr Angewandte Linguistik, 2018(68), 333. https://doi.org/doi:10.1515/zfal-2018-0002

  • Reershemius, G. (2019). Lamppost networks: stickers as a genre in urban semiotic landscapes. Social Semiotics, 29(5), 622–644. https://doi.org/10.1080/10350330.2018.1504652


Back to course schedule ⏎